Skip to main content
Blog/Sell Accessibility Retainers
Agency Monetisation

How to Sell Accessibility Retainers to Web Clients After the EAA

The EAA is not a one-time deadline — it is a continuous compliance obligation. Here is how to reframe accessibility from a panic audit into a recurring service your clients will pay for every month.

May 202612 min read
On This Page

The Retainer Opportunity the EAA Creates

Most agencies approached the European Accessibility Act as a deadline problem. Clients needed to get compliant by June 2025, so agencies ran audits, fixed the most critical issues, and filed the engagement under "done". That framing is understandable — and it leaves significant recurring revenue on the table.

The EAA is not structured like a building permit that you obtain once and forget. EU market surveillance authorities have ongoing mandates. Consumer complaints can be filed at any time. The German Bundesnetzagentur, the French ARCOM, the Dutch ACM — these bodies are not checking whether you passed a one-time certification exam. They are checking whether your client's service is accessible right now, today, when a user with a disability tries to use it.

Sites Regress. Constantly.

This is the insight that changes the conversation. A site that passes an audit in January will almost certainly have new accessibility issues by March. The causes are mundane and unavoidable:

  • CMS updates — a WordPress core or Shopify theme update ships with a new navigation component that lacks focus indicators. No developer deliberately introduced the issue; it arrived with an automatic update.
  • New plugins and widgets — a marketing team installs a cookie consent banner, a live chat widget, or a pop-up form. These third-party scripts routinely introduce keyboard traps, missing labels, and colour contrast failures.
  • Content changes — a new promotional image without alt text, a video uploaded without captions, a PDF data sheet without accessible tagging. Content editors introduce these constantly.
  • Feature releases — a new checkout flow, a redesigned product page, a personalised recommendation carousel. New development work routinely reintroduces patterns that were fixed in a previous round.

For your agency, this is a structural business opportunity. Every site you have ever audited is a candidate for a monitoring retainer — because every one of those sites is continuously evolving, and no one-time audit stays accurate.

Monthly monitoring is a defensible position. When your client receives a regulatory inquiry or a consumer complaint, the first question from their legal team will be: "What evidence do we have that we take accessibility seriously?" Twelve months of monthly scan reports, showing a tracked score and a record of issues found and fixed, is a far stronger answer than a single audit from two years ago.


What an Accessibility Monitoring Retainer Actually Delivers

Before you pitch a retainer, you need a clear definition of what it includes. The vagueness of "ongoing accessibility support" is what makes clients hesitate. Here is a concrete service definition you can use.

Core Monthly Deliverables

1. Monthly Automated Scan

A full automated scan of the site's key page templates using axe-core against WCAG 2.1 AA criteria. Covers home page, product/listing pages, checkout or conversion flow, contact forms, and any other high-traffic templates. Automated scanning reliably catches 30-40% of WCAG issues — contrast failures, missing labels, invalid ARIA, keyboard traps — with zero ambiguity.

2. Branded Report with Score

A professional PDF-style report showing the current accessibility score (0-100), a severity breakdown of issues (critical / major / minor), and the score compared with the previous month. Clients can share this with their management and legal teams as evidence of ongoing diligence. The report is the product — its quality directly reflects on your agency.

3. Issue Delta: New and Resolved

A clear list of issues that appeared since last month and issues that were resolved. This delta is more actionable than a raw issue list — it shows the team what regressions need immediate attention and what remediation work is visibly moving the score forward.

4. Remediation Guidance

For the top three to five remaining risks, specific remediation guidance: which WCAG criterion is violated, why it matters, and a concrete code-level or content-level fix. This is what separates a monitoring report from a bare compliance scan — it reduces the work required to act on the findings.

5. Annual Accessibility Statement Update

Once per year, update the client's published accessibility statement to reflect the current conformance level and known issues. Several EAA national transpositions require a statement, and keeping it current is a low-cost way to demonstrate active compliance management.

The Contrast with "We Fixed It Once"

The critical difference between a retainer and a one-time audit is continuity of evidence. A one-time audit says: "Your site had these issues on this date, and we fixed them." A monitoring retainer says: "Your site has been actively monitored every month for twelve months. Here is the score trend. Here is the issue record. Here is what was introduced and what was resolved."

For a client facing a regulatory inquiry or a competitor complaint, the second narrative is incomparably stronger — and worth significantly more than the one-time audit fee.


Pricing Packages

Accessibility monitoring should be priced as a fixed monthly service, not hourly. Fixed pricing creates predictable cash flow for your agency and predictable costs for the client — a critical factor in retainer adoption. The following packages align with the retainer calculator on the AccessiProof for Agencies page.

Essentials

199 € / month

1 site
  • Monthly scan across key page templates
  • Branded monthly monitoring report with score
  • Month-on-month score comparison and issue delta
  • Annual accessibility statement update

Your margin: Bill the client 300–450 €/mo. Underlying platform cost at this tier is approximately 99 €/mo per site slot. Net margin per site: 200–350 €/mo.

Standard — Most Popular

349 € / month

Up to 3 sites
  • Everything in Essentials, for up to 3 sites
  • Cross-site score comparison in summary view
  • Remediation guidance for top 3 issues per site
  • Quarterly summary email to client stakeholders

Your margin: Bill 500–750 €/mo for the bundle (or 200–300 € per site individually). Underlying cost roughly 149 €/mo for 3 slots. Net margin: 350–600 €/mo.

Growth

599 € / month

Up to 8 sites
  • Everything in Standard, for up to 8 sites
  • Prioritised issue list ranked by regression risk
  • Annual accessibility statement for each site
  • Dedicated agency dashboard with portfolio-level view

Your margin: Bill EUR 900–1,800+/mo for the portfolio (150–250 € per site). Underlying cost roughly 199 €/mo for 8 slots. Net margin: 700–1,600 €/mo from a single client relationship.

Use the retainer revenue calculator to model your potential monthly recurring revenue based on your current client base. An agency managing 15 client sites with a mix of Essentials and Standard retainers can generate EUR 3,000–5,000/month in pure monitoring revenue — before any remediation work.


The Retainer Pitch

The best moment to pitch a monitoring retainer is immediately after delivering an audit. The client has just seen evidence that their site has accessibility issues. They have paid for a report. They are in a compliance mindset. This is precisely when the "and how do we make sure this doesn't come back?" question is most natural.

Three Email Hook Sentences

When following up after audit delivery, lead with one of these hooks depending on what the audit found:

If the score was poor: "Your site scored 58/100 on this audit — we can fix the critical issues, but without ongoing monitoring, the next CMS update or plugin change will introduce new ones within weeks. Here is what monthly monitoring looks like."

If the score improved after remediation: "You are now at 84/100 — that is significant progress. To protect that score going forward, monthly monitoring catches regressions before they accumulate. The first alert usually pays for itself."

If there are high-regression-risk issues flagged: "The audit identified three issues marked as high regression risk — they are likely to reappear after your next plugin update. Monthly scanning means you know within days, not months."

Tie the Pitch to the Report Itself

The audit report is your best sales tool. Every paid audit report includes a regression risk tag on issues that are statistically likely to recur. Point to those specifically when pitching the retainer — it makes the monitoring value proposition concrete rather than abstract.

If your agency uses AccessiProof, the outreach kit in the dashboard includes pre-written follow-up email templates and a shareable sample monitoring report link you can send to the client before the pitch call. Showing a client what the monthly report looks like — with a live score ring, score delta, and issue breakdown — converts significantly better than describing it in words.

See what you would be selling before you pitch it

View Sample Monthly Monitoring Report

What to Promise — and What Not to Promise

This section matters more than any other in protecting your agency. Accessibility retainers sit near legal compliance, which means the language you use in proposals and contracts carries real liability risk if you overreach.

Promise This

  • Monthly automated scans against WCAG 2.1 AA criteria
  • Score tracking and month-on-month comparison report
  • Identification of new and resolved issues each month
  • Remediation guidance for highest-priority issues
  • Annual update to the published accessibility statement
  • A documented record of compliance monitoring activity

Never Promise This

  • Full WCAG 2.2 conformance or "certified compliant" status
  • Legal protection from fines or regulatory action
  • "No complaints guarantee" or zero-penalty assurance
  • Coverage of manual or assistive-technology-only issues (automated tools have limits)
  • Compliance of third-party scripts your agency does not control

The Right Language

Frame your service consistently as "monitoring and evidence", not "certification and protection". The distinction matters legally and it is also more accurate — no automated scanning service can certify full WCAG conformance, and no agency can guarantee that regulators will not investigate.

Recommended contract language: "AccessiProof monitoring covers automated detection of accessibility issues against WCAG 2.1 Level AA criteria. Monthly reports document scanning activity and identified issues. This service constitutes evidence of ongoing accessibility monitoring and does not constitute legal advice or a guarantee of regulatory compliance."

This framing is honest, it sets appropriate expectations, and — crucially — it is still valuable. Evidence of ongoing diligence is exactly what legal teams and regulators respond to.


Handling the Three Most Common Client Objections

Most retainer pitches stall on one of three objections. Here is how to address each one honestly and effectively.

"We Already Did an Audit"

This is the most common objection and the easiest to counter with evidence rather than argument.

Response:

"Great — when was the last scan run? We find that sites typically show new issues within 60-90 days of a remediation round, often introduced by plugin updates or new content. I can run a fresh scan now and we can compare it to your last report — if nothing has changed, you have confirmation. If something has changed, you have an early warning."

Run the free scan before the follow-up call. The before/after comparison makes the case without any sales pressure. If the site has regressed — which it almost always has — the numbers speak for themselves.

"We Use an Overlay / Accessibility Widget"

Accessibility overlays — JavaScript widgets that claim to automatically fix accessibility issues — are popular with businesses looking for a quick fix. They are also controversial: major accessibility organisations and legal actions have documented that overlays do not reliably deliver WCAG conformance.

Response:

"Overlays can assist with some surface-level fixes, but automated scans consistently find unresolved issues on overlay-equipped sites — particularly around keyboard navigation, form labelling, and dynamic content. The overlay vendor's own terms typically disclaim compliance guarantees. Monthly monitoring gives you a factual record of what the overlay is and is not catching."

Do not argue against the overlay — you are not asking them to remove it. Position monitoring as complementary and independent verification. If the overlay is working, the scan reports will confirm that. If it is not, the evidence is useful.

"We Will Handle It Internally"

Some clients — particularly those with in-house development teams — believe accessibility monitoring is something they can own themselves. This is not necessarily wrong; the question is whether they will actually do it consistently.

Response:

"Absolutely — if your dev team runs monthly scans and documents the results, that is a strong position. Our retainer is essentially the infrastructure and reporting layer so the team does not have to build or maintain it. It also provides an independent, third-party record, which carries more weight than internal self-assessments if a complaint is ever filed. What does your current monitoring cadence look like?"

The last question is the key move. Internal intentions rarely survive a busy sprint cycle. Asking "what does your current monitoring cadence look like?" surfaces the gap between intention and practice without being confrontational.


What the Monthly Deliverable Looks Like

The quality of your monthly report is the quality of your retainer. Clients who see a professional, clear, and actionable report each month renew. Clients who receive a raw axe-core JSON export or a dense table of violations churn — or, worse, quietly stop reading it and then cancel at the first budget review.

The Structure of a Good Monthly Report

1

Score Ring with Delta

A circular score visualisation (0-100) showing the current score prominently, with a delta indicator showing movement since last month. Executives read this in five seconds. The ring communicates "improving", "stable", or "regressed" without requiring any interpretation.

2

Issue Breakdown by Severity

A clear count of critical, major, and minor issues — and how those counts changed from last month. New issues are flagged as regressions. Resolved issues are shown as wins. This is the delta section that makes the monitoring value visible.

3

Top 3 Remaining Risks

The three issues with the highest combined severity and regression-risk score, each with a one-paragraph explanation of the WCAG criterion violated, the impact on users, and the recommended fix. This is the section a developer opens and turns into a task ticket.

4

New Issues This Month

A table of issues that appeared since the previous scan. Each row includes the page, the WCAG criterion, a severity badge, and a brief description. This is what catches regressions introduced by recent site changes.

5

Fixed Issues This Month

Issues present in the prior month that are no longer detected. This section validates that remediation work is having an effect — important for showing clients (and their stakeholders) that the service is progressing, not just endlessly cataloguing problems.

See a full example of the monthly monitoring report format

View Sample Monthly Monitoring Report

Getting Your First Retainer: A Practical Playbook

Theory is useful; a concrete action plan is more useful. Here is a five-step playbook to land your first monitoring retainer within the next 30 days.

Step 1 — Identify Your Three Most Exposed Clients

Filter your client list by EAA exposure: any client in e-commerce, financial services, or consumer transport serving customers in Germany, France, or the Netherlands is highest priority. These are the sectors and jurisdictions with the most active enforcement. If a client has ten or more employees and takes online orders, they are almost certainly covered. Create a shortlist of three.

Step 2 — Run a Free Scan on Each Site

Before any outreach, run a free baseline scan on each shortlisted site. You are not doing this to create a deliverable — you are doing it to arm yourself with specific findings before the conversation. When you can open a call with "Your site currently scores 61/100 and has 4 critical issues, including a missing form label on the checkout page", the conversation is entirely different from "we think you might have accessibility issues".

Step 3 — Offer the First Month Free

For your first three retainer clients, offer the first month at no charge. The goal is not revenue from month one — it is getting a report into the client's hands so they can see the value. A client who has read their first monthly monitoring report converts to a paid retainer at a far higher rate than a client who is evaluating based on your description. The cost of a free month is the scan infrastructure cost, which is minimal. The upside is a recurring revenue relationship worth 2,400-7,200 €/year per client.

Step 4 — Walk Through the Report Together

Do not just email the first report. Book a 30-minute call to walk through it. The score ring, the delta, the top three risks — spend five minutes on each section. Ask the client which issues they want to prioritise. By the end of the call, the retainer pitch is implicit: "So — to keep tracking this and catching new issues before they accumulate, would it make sense to continue on a monthly basis?"

Step 5 — Convert After the Second Report

If you ran month one free, send the second report with a simple note: "Here is your month two report. Your score moved from 61 to 68 — three issues resolved, two new ones from the plugin update last week. To continue monthly monitoring, the Essentials plan is 199 €/month. I will send a payment link if you would like to continue." At this point the client has seen the value twice. Most will continue.

Why Three Clients Is the Right Starting Point

Three retainers at 199-349 €/month each generates EUR 600-1,050/month in new recurring revenue with minimal marginal work. More importantly, three clients gives you real-world feedback on your reporting process, your pitch, and your pricing — before you invest in a full service launch. Once those three are running smoothly, the playbook is proven and you scale from a working model rather than a hypothesis.

Use the retainer revenue calculator to model what your full client base could generate at different adoption rates. Most agencies are surprised how quickly the numbers add up with even 20-30% of existing clients on a monitoring plan.

Start Here

See what you would be selling before you pitch it

View the sample monthly monitoring report, then run a free scan on one of your client sites to get the numbers you need for the conversation.

Or calculate your potential retainer revenue with the agency calculator.